Hi Ramanand,

What I meant is to remove those new resources so that "GMT+hh:mm" is used for formatting. There may be some tests that require changes.

Thanks,
Masayoshi

On 3/28/2016 7:31 PM, Ramanand Patil wrote:
Hi Masayoshi,

Currently I have not defined the new TimeZoneNames with +hh format, instead I 
have defined them as per the earlier convention like:

+            {"Asia/Barnaul", new String[] {"Barnaul Time", "BAT",
+                                           "Barnaul Summer Time", "BAST",
+                                           "Barnaul Time", "BAT"}},

+            {"Europe/Astrakhan", new String[] {"Astrakhan Time", "ASTT",
+                                               "Astrakhan Summer Time", 
"ASTST",
+                                               "Astrakhan Time", "ASTT"}},

+            {"Europe/Ulyanovsk", new String[] {"Ulyanovsk Time", "ULT",
+                                               "Ulyanovsk Summer Time", "ULST",
+                                               "Ulyanovsk Time", "ULT"}},



Please let me know if this is fine.


Regards,
Ramanand.

-----Original Message-----
From: Masayoshi Okutsu
Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2016 7:22 PM
To: Ramanand Patil; i18n-dev@openjdk.java.net
Cc: core-libs-...@openjdk.java.net
Subject: Re: RFR: 8151876: (tz) Support tzdata2016b

Sorry for this belated response.

I prefer to follow the tzdata abbreviations, like "+04". But that would require 
some major changes. An option would be not to define time zone names for the new zones 
with the +hh format.

Thanks,
Masayoshi

On 3/17/2016 4:38 AM, Ramanand Patil wrote:
Hi all,

Please review the latest TZDATA (tzdata2016b) integration to JDK9.

Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8151876

Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~rpatil/8151876/webrev.00/

All the TimeZone related tests are passed after integration.

Please note that, as per the release notes: As a trial of a new system that needs less information 
to be made up, the new zones use numeric time zone abbreviations like "+04" instead of 
invented abbreviations like "ASTT".

Since this is a trial system, I have ignored this in the current patch which 
adds 3 new timezones. But I think it's worth discussing this new system along 
with this bug and get the experts opinion on this.

Do you think that JDK should also follow these IANA timezone naming system for zone 
abbreviations in future ?  Will it be convenient to use such numeric time zone 
abbreviations ? (Also, it looks like the abbreviations similar to "+03/+04" 
will be used for the zones linked to the rule set with changing letters like: EST/EDT for 
US, MSK/MSD for RU, etc..).

Regards,

Ramanand.


Reply via email to