Hi all, I would like someone from java.time to do a second review for this.
Regards, Ramanand. -----Original Message----- From: Masayoshi Okutsu Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2016 5:09 AM To: Ramanand Patil; i18n-dev@openjdk.java.net Cc: core-libs-...@openjdk.java.net Subject: Re: RFR: 8151876: (tz) Support tzdata2016c Looks good to me. But I'd like someone from java.time to review the changes to see if it's OK for java.time. Masayoshi On 4/4/2016 6:50 PM, Ramanand Patil wrote: > Hi all, > > Please review the latest TZDATA (tzdata2016c) integration to JDK9. > > Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8151876 > > Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~rpatil/8151876/webrev.00/ > > All the TimeZone related tests are passed after integration. > > > > Please note that this patch includes both tzdata2016b and tzdata2016c > integration. The tzdata2016b review was abandoned because tzdata2016c was > already released. > > As suggested by Masayoshi, changes are made such that, "GMT+hh:mm" is used > for formatting of the newly added TimeZones in tzdata2016b. > > [This is done to accommodate the IANA's new trial system where the new > zones use numeric time zone abbreviations like "+04" instead of > invented abbreviations like "ASTT".] > > > > Regards, > > Ramanand.
