Looks good to me.
Masayoshi
On 9/24/2016 2:00 PM, Philip Race wrote:
1) version change is only if the format is incompatible - so no change
there.
2) paths being absent is not a new issue. It has always been the case
that a
file is not present on a system at runtime. This was historically very
common. The
implementation should handle this.
-phil.
On 9/23/16, 8:17 AM, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
The changes looks fine, should we increment version=1 to other
version or it is not used? Unrelated question is how we validate all
these paths if some of them are absent?
On 23.09.16 8:08, Philip Race wrote:
PING .. any takers on this two week old RFR ?
-phil.
On 9/8/16, 1:12 PM, Philip Race wrote:
[Fix i18n-dev address]
-phil.
On 9/8/16, 1:10 PM, Philip Race wrote:
Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8162531
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~prr/8162531/
Solaris 10 is not supported by JDK 9.
This updates the fontconfig file to focus on the default set of fonts
installed on Solaris 11 as part its desktop.
Preference is given to the Arial, Times New Roman, and Courier New
fonts
that are included with Solaris, as well as other monotype fonts.
Dejavau Sans is listed for some fallback coverage of less commonly
used
unicode blocks.
10646-1 encoding is referenced so as to reduce the number of entries.
More UTF 8 locales were added since that is the default on Solaris
11.
-phil.
