On Sun, 4 Nov 2001, Tomohiro KUBOTA wrote: > I found that FONT_ASCENT and FONT_DESCENT for 18x18ja and 18x18ko > fonts (15 and 3, respectively) are different from those for > 9x18 font (14 and 4, respectively).
I think I answered that before: We didn't have much choice here as the single-width font needs that much foot space for combining characters below to work and the double-width source fonts dictated the base line there. It seems not a big problem as long as only ideographic characters are taken from 18x18*, as ideographs often don't have a well-identified base-line anyway, and it's slightly annoying only if you mix for instance single-width and doublewidth Latin characters. Probably to late anyway now. Or what operation exactly do you suggest? In any case, these fonts were just designed to get started at all and I hope that others will come up soon with nicer alternative fonts. Markus -- Markus G. Kuhn, Computer Laboratory, University of Cambridge, UK Email: mkuhn at acm.org, WWW: <http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~mgk25/> _______________________________________________ I18n mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/i18n
