> Yes I see. > As for me I prefer variants. Since we have a two-level model Layout/Variant > (or even three-level with XkbModel) it would be better to tie these levels > to other terms such as a Language (or country) and a variants inside the > language layout. (Just my opinion, of course). > Note that there are also XkbOptions which can be used for 'minor changes' > common for all layouts. > > > How would this look if qwerty was a variant of cz? > > Obviously, like cz(qwerty_winkeys). > Have you seen a complete list of subsections in the Hungarian keyboard map? :) > > BTW it is one of reasons why I'd suggest to pay attention to the new > incarnation for a 'description file'. > In my opinion although the layout names are pretty clear the variant > names shouldn't be used for a manual XKb configuration. Of course you > can give them quite understandable names but comprehensive descriptions > are better.
I see. Well I don't have a strong opinion on this topic. I posted a conservative patch for cz and sk maps to supply missing variants where I tried to minimalize needed combinations (which could greatly increase with qwerty as a variant). But as I said, I'd be glad if a common pattern of naming, variants and descriptions is made and the files adjusted accordingly ;) Kamil _______________________________________________ I18n mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/i18n
