> Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 11:11:51 +0100 > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [email protected] > Subject: Re: I2C_PARPORT_LIGHT dependence problem > > Hi Adam, > > On Sat, 19 Jan 2008 13:37:05 -0500, Adam Turk wrote: >> I am updating an old config to run on 2.6.23.14 and noticed I am >> still prompted for I2C_PARPORT_LIGHT even though I don't have >> the parallel port driver enabled. Shouldn't I2C_PARPORT_LIGHT >> depend on the parallel port being selected? (...) >> >> Symbol: I2C_PARPORT_LIGHT [=n] >> │ Prompt: Parallel port adapter (light) >> │ Defined at drivers/i2c/busses/Kconfig:348 >> │ Depends on: I2C >> │ Location: >> │ -> Device Drivers >> │ -> I2C support (I2C [=m]) >> │ -> I2C Hardware Bus support >> │ Selects: I2C_ALGOBIT > > The help text says: > > "This driver is a light version of i2c-parport. It doesn't depend on > the parport driver, and uses direct I/O access instead." > > So I think that the (lack of) dependencies is correct. We don't want to > force the user to select PARPORT (and built the parport driver) to get > access to the i2c-parport-light driver which does NOT need this parport > driver. > > -- > Jean Delvare
Thanks for the clarification. Adam _________________________________________________________________ Shed those extra pounds with MSN and The Biggest Loser! http://biggestloser.msn.com/ _______________________________________________ i2c mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/i2c
