So, like, the other day Jon Smirl mumbled: > Convert MPC i2c driver from a platform_driver to a > of_platform_driver. Add the ability to dynamically load i2c drivers > based on device tree names. Routine names were changed from fsl_ to > mpc_ to make them match the file name. Common code moved to > powerpc-common.* Orginal ppc driver left intact for deletion when ppc > arch is removed.
This seems backwards to me. I was under the impression that our trend was _toward_ "Freescale" and "fsl" names...? And aren't the drivers also already using "fsl-i2c" in the DTS files as called out in the b-w-o.txt too? Grumble long lines not hard-limited to 70-ish columns, yes, even in log messages... :-) jdl _______________________________________________ i2c mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/i2c
