On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 7:38 AM, David Brownell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Monday 25 February 2008, Felipe Balbi wrote: > > Jean, I'm thinking about introducing include/asm/arch/isp1301.h > > Or maybe isp1301_omap.h to match the driver name. > > > > > so I > > can introduce struct isp1301_platform_data to pass irq_flags to the > > driver. > > Passing irq_flags??? That sounds like nonsense. Please explain ...
request_irq was using different irq flags depending on the board, so instead of keeping if (machine_is_*) in the driver just because of irq flags we could bring it from a platform_data. > > > By the way, I see why there's no board-h2.c update. One of > the patches in December stripped out most of the tps65010 > i2c_board info from mainline, replacing some of it with > isp1301 stuff ... that can't possibly work in mainline. > > So there are going to be some H2 and H3 regression-fix > patches upcoming... that's true... -- Best Regards, Felipe Balbi [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ i2c mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/i2c
