> drivers, so "i2c-eeprom" would be confusing. "at24" is just fine and I
> see no reason to change the name. The Linux driver tree is full of
> vendor-specific names, and this has never been a problem.
I just wondered why we should pick one vendor's name altough the driver
is designed to work for all vendors. Not the biggest question at the
moment, though ;)
Wolfram
--
Dipl.-Ing. Wolfram Sang | http://www.pengutronix.de
Pengutronix - Linux Solutions for Science and Industry
_______________________________________________
i2c mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/i2c
