* Remove commented-out code.
* Use dev_warn instead of printk.
* Remove a legacy comment.
Signed-off-by: Jean Delvare <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-sis5595.c | 12 ++----------
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
--- linux-2.6.26-rc0.orig/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-sis5595.c 2008-04-26
10:44:00.000000000 +0200
+++ linux-2.6.26-rc0/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-sis5595.c 2008-04-26
10:56:05.000000000 +0200
@@ -316,14 +316,8 @@ static s32 sis5595_access(struct i2c_ada
}
size = (size == I2C_SMBUS_PROC_CALL) ? SIS5595_PROC_CALL :
SIS5595_WORD_DATA;
break;
-/*
- case I2C_SMBUS_BLOCK_DATA:
- printk(KERN_WARNING "sis5595.o: Block data not yet
implemented!\n");
- return -1;
- break;
-*/
default:
- printk(KERN_WARNING "sis5595.o: Unsupported transaction %d\n",
size);
+ dev_warn(&adap->dev, "Unsupported transaction %d\n", size);
return -1;
}
@@ -338,9 +332,7 @@ static s32 sis5595_access(struct i2c_ada
switch (size) {
- case SIS5595_BYTE: /* Where is the result put? I assume here it is
in
- SMB_DATA but it might just as well be in the
- SMB_CMD. No clue in the docs */
+ case SIS5595_BYTE:
case SIS5595_BYTE_DATA:
data->byte = sis5595_read(SMB_BYTE);
break;
--
Jean Delvare
_______________________________________________
i2c mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/i2c
