On Wednesday 07 May 2008, Jean Delvare wrote: > Hmm, how does your patch differ from the one David Brownell sent a few > days ago? > > http://lists.lm-sensors.org/pipermail/i2c/2008-May/003503.html
Almost exactly the same title. ;) My version passes "checkpatch.pl --strict" as I recall. And some of the errno values are different ... I tried to avoid overusing EINVAL and EIO, and made PEC errors be unique. - Dave _______________________________________________ i2c mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/i2c
