Hi Jean,

> I agree, i2c-sibyte is very old code, and unmaintained, coding style is
> horrible. That's one more reason to not include random style cleanups
> in a patch doing functional changes, the improvement will hardly be
> visible. If you care about cleaning up the code of this driver - and I
> would appreciate that - please make a separate patch.

 While I have not officially undertaken maintenance of code to support any
of the pieces of hardware relevant to the SWARM board, I have done a
considerable number of changes throughout all the bits and if you have any
concern related to this piece of code (or any other I am referring to
here), then you are certainly welcome to contact me directly, cc-ing
linux-mips, perhaps.  I do SWARM development solely in my free time and I
simply cannot afford chasing all the bits around, especially ones I do not
actively use.  I do try to care about bits other people have concerns
about though.

  Maciej

_______________________________________________
i2c mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/i2c

Reply via email to