On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 09:08:18PM +0200, Jean Delvare wrote: > Would you have the possibility to review and ack this patch (with the > suggested fix above, of course)? I'd like to include it in my i2c tree > now as it has been around for some time but I'm a bit short of time to > review it and I also can't test it. If you can do that then I'll trust > your review and take the patch quickly. Well, I could review it and give further testing on Monday. Still, I wouldn't call my experiences in the linux-kernelspace (yet) big enough to trust only this review. Still, thanks for your trust :)
> With the time saved, I could, say, review the at24c driver ;) Hehe, nice offer. Though, I'd suggest to wait for the upcoming version of the at24-driver, which will include proper device table support. I already made up my mind how to implement it, just have to get hacking. Wolfram -- Dipl.-Ing. Wolfram Sang | http://www.pengutronix.de Pengutronix - Linux Solutions for Science and Industry
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ i2c mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/i2c
