On Sat, 17 May 2008 07:33:36 -0700, David Brownell wrote: > On Saturday 17 May 2008, Jean Delvare wrote: > > I'd rather spell it "16-bit", that's what developers are used to I > > think. > > ISTR some "how 2 right gud inglish" style guide, maybe the > Univerity of Chicago one (or Turabian, or Strunk and White), > saying to use the word form, not the digit form, except when > the text is really about numbers/dates. Certainly *mixing* > two forms would be bad, and having only one digit-format > number is a degenerate case of mixing. (Ergo my scribble.)
Apparently the kernel developers don't give a damn to whatever style guide you read. "16 bit" overrules "sixteen bit" by 2858 to 3 in the current kernel tree ;) > > Please send an updated patch, or if you prefer I can adjust it myself. > > It'll go faster if you make these last changes ... Done. -- Jean Delvare _______________________________________________ i2c mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/i2c
