The eeprom driver shouldn't probe i2c buses which don't want to be
probed.

Signed-off-by: Jean Delvare <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
 drivers/i2c/chips/eeprom.c |    8 ++++++++
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)

--- linux-2.6.26-rc4.orig/drivers/i2c/chips/eeprom.c    2008-06-03 
09:57:31.000000000 +0200
+++ linux-2.6.26-rc4/drivers/i2c/chips/eeprom.c 2008-06-03 10:46:09.000000000 
+0200
@@ -159,6 +159,8 @@ static struct bin_attribute eeprom_attr 
 
 static int eeprom_attach_adapter(struct i2c_adapter *adapter)
 {
+       if (!(adapter->class & (I2C_CLASS_DDC | I2C_CLASS_SPD)))
+               return 0;
        return i2c_probe(adapter, &addr_data, eeprom_detect);
 }
 
@@ -169,6 +171,12 @@ static int eeprom_detect(struct i2c_adap
        struct eeprom_data *data;
        int err = 0;
 
+       /* EDID EEPROMs are often 24C00 EEPROMs, which answer to all
+          addresses 0x50-0x57, but we only care about 0x50. So decline
+          attaching to addresses >= 0x51 on DDC buses */
+       if (!(adapter->class & I2C_CLASS_SPD) && address >= 0x51)
+               goto exit;
+
        /* There are three ways we can read the EEPROM data:
           (1) I2C block reads (faster, but unsupported by most adapters)
           (2) Consecutive byte reads (100% overhead)


-- 
Jean Delvare

_______________________________________________
i2c mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/i2c

Reply via email to