On 6/5/08, Jean Delvare <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Care to enlighten me on what this other way would be? It's easy to > claim this of pretty much everything, but that's not valuable without > details on the "other way", sorry.
I'm just proposing optimizations to the scheme, we are in agreement on the core of the proposal. Let's go ahead with the way you proposed (with it moved to i2c_driver). Then after you get everything working with the new scheme I'll see if I can add optimizations to remove some of the entry points. It is more important to get the old to new driver conversion going. -- Jon Smirl [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ i2c mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/i2c
