On Mon, 9 Jun 2008 08:51:10 +0200 Jean Delvare <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi, Jean! > > I'd say yes, they do. zoran_card.c contain lists detailing chips, and those > > are available for reference at bus creation time. Would you know of any > > driver I can look at to see how this new style stuff works? The "new style" > > i2c things I've encountered so far is the 2.6 i2c subsystem as used when 2.4 > > style drivers are converted with a minimum amount of work involved. > > "New-style" i2c drivers are drivers which follow the device driver > model and do not create their own devices (i2c_client). As opposed to > "legacy" i2c drivers in 2.4 kernels and early 2.6 kernels (and still a > lot of drivers in the current 2.6 kernel) which create their own > i2c_client. That explains things. Good, then that should be the route to take. > Ben wrote a guide about converting legacy drivers to new-style drivers: > http://marc.info/?l=i2c&m=121250094017709&w=2 Excellent, it looks simple enough. > If you want to go that route for the zoran driver, you'll have to > convert some of the chip drivers (at least bt866 and saa7185 if they > are the ones causing trouble), and also modify the main zoran driver to > create these devices (using i2c_new_device or i2c_new_probed_device) and > remove them (using i2c_unregister_device) as needed. bt866 belongs to the avs6eyes part of the zoran driver, while saa7185 belongs to the buz one. > One problem may be if some of the chip drivers are shared with other > V4L adapters (apparently the bt866 driver is zoran-only, but I'm not > sure about the saa7185 driver). In that case you can't just convert > them to new-style, or you would break the other adapters which expect > the legacy drivers. So you'd have to make hybrid chip drivers, keeping > the legacy driver (for other adapters) and adding a new-style driver > (for zoran.) > > In that case, you probably want to look at what Hans Verkuil did for > the ivtv and cx18 adapters, and maybe talk to him. He wrote helper > wrappers to write such hybrid chip drivers easily. That sounds good, too. Breaking other people's drivers isn't nice. > Note that I have a DC10+ somewhere in a drawer, so if you're going to > convert the zoran drivers to the new-style model, I can help you with > testing. And if you have questions in the process, feel free to ask. > I'll be happy to review your patches. Very good indeed. I'd work on some other chips, too, but there should be people that can test those not on the DC10+. > P.S.: I don't know how much energy you are going to put in the zoran > driver, but I have a number of patches for it, which never made it > upstream, if you're interested. I'm not going to commit myself to it full time. Not even half time or anything resembling that, because I seldom get away from life long enough for serious hacking. Zoran improvements are good, though, and if you don't have the time to commit them, I might do. Regards, /Sam _______________________________________________ i2c mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/i2c
