On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 05:24:59PM +0900, Magnus Damm wrote: > On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 4:56 PM, Ben Dooks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > You are changing a simple test to a mask and compare, is anyone going > > to produce resources with an IORESOURCE_MEM and an IORESOURCE_IO > > together? > > Actually, I'd like to replace the one-bit-per-type strategy with a > N-bit counter. But that is not very compatible with the case you are > pointing out. I'm not sure if that's a combination we really want to > support though. Both IRQ and DMA doesn't make much sense to me. =)
I'm not saying it is a bad idea, I just do not know if anyone is currently relying on this to work... -- Ben ([EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.fluff.org/) 'a smiley only costs 4 bytes' _______________________________________________ i2c mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/i2c
