Grant Likely wrote: > Ugh. This is specifically related to the i2c device, so please place > the property in the i2c device. Remember, device tree design is not > about what will make the implementation simplest, but rather about what > describes the hardware in the best way.
His proposal would make the implementation less simple, not more simple. > Now, if you can argue that i2c-clock-frequency is actually a separate > clock domain defined at the SoC level, not the i2c device level, then I > will change my opinion. It isn't. I don't have the Verilog for the I2C device, but I'm pretty sure the divider is a very simple circuit that's located just outside the I2C circuitry, but it still unique to the I2C device. There is no "I2C clock" running through the SOC. -- Timur Tabi Linux kernel developer at Freescale _______________________________________________ i2c mailing list i2c@lm-sensors.org http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/i2c
