Trent Piepho wrote: > On Thu, 31 Jul 2008, Jon Smirl wrote: [...snip...] >> I don't see why we want to go through the trouble of having uboot tell >> us things about a chip that are fixed in stone. Obviously something >> like the frequency of the external crystal needs to be passed up, but >> why pass up stuff that can be computed (or recovered by reading a >> register)? > > One could also say that if U-boot has to have the code and already > calculated the value, why duplicate the code and the calculation in Linux?
Right, if the "bus-frequency" property for the I2C device is not defined, the Linux I2C bus driver should just overtake the pre-defined values. That's what I (we?) wanted to implement anyhow. Wolfgang. _______________________________________________ i2c mailing list i2c@lm-sensors.org http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/i2c
