On Tue, Aug 05, 2008 at 02:37:51PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu, 31 Jul 2008 19:43:54 +0900
> Paul Mundt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > +   /*
> > +    * The R0P7780LC0011RL FPGA needs a significant delay between
> > +    * data read cycles, otherwise the transciever gets confused and
> > +    * garbage is returned when the read is subsequently aborted.
> > +    *
> > +    * It is not sufficient to wait for BBSY.
> > +    *
> > +    * While this generally only applies to the older SH7780-based
> > +    * Highlanders, the same issue can be observed on SH7785 ones,
> > +    * albeit less frequently. SH7780-based Highlanders may need
> > +    * this to be as high as 1000 ms.
> > +    */
> > +   if (iic_read_delay && time_before(jiffies, dev->last_read_time +
> > +                            msecs_to_jiffies(iic_read_delay)))
> > +           msleep_interruptible(jiffies_to_msecs((dev->last_read_time +
> > +                           msecs_to_jiffies(iic_read_delay)) - jiffies));
> 
> If this task has signal_pending(), msleep_interruptible() will
> immediately return.
> 
> > +   cnt = (dev->buf_len + 1) >> 1;
> > +   for (i = 0; i < cnt; i++) {
> > +           data[i] = ioread16(dev->base + SMTRDR + (i * sizeof(u16)));
> > +           dev_dbg(dev->dev, "read data[%x] 0x%04x\n", i, data[i]);
> > +   }
> > +
> > +   smbus_read_data(data, dev->buf, dev->buf_len);
> > +
> > +   dev->last_read_time = jiffies;
> 
> In which case I assume that the above will screw up.
> 
Ah, right. Yes, that should be switched to msleep instead. Feel free to
drop the _interruptible part from the patch, or I can send an update if
you prefer.

_______________________________________________
i2c mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/i2c

Reply via email to