Ben Dooks wrote: > On Tue, Aug 05, 2008 at 03:17:11PM +0400, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: >> i2c_pxa_abort can be called from the atomic context. Change it to use >> mdelay and counted loop. > > if this can be called from an atomic context, is there a distinct > possibility you are going to stop execution of the entire cpu for the > time it takes to sort this out? Is it possible to disable the interrupt > request, fire a work-struct to deal with this and then re-enabled the > controller once it is finished?
If the bus isn't stalled by some hanged device, the reset will happen very fast, so I don't see a reason to take that route. However I'd implement the suggestion by Eric to choose mdelay or msleep based on the atomicity of the context. > >> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- With best wishes Dmitry _______________________________________________ i2c mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/i2c
