Jean Delvare wrote: > OK. There's no real need to make this a separate patch. In fact I think > your first patch would be easier to read with these alignment issues > fixed, as it makes it easier to figure out what code paths your changes > are replacing. As a matter of fact, I applied this second patch before > reviewing the first one. > > Hey Jean,
First of all, thanks a lot for reviewing. It's very appriciated. I've read and noted your comments, but will reply more detailed to the first patch later. Quite busy lately (new house, graduated => new job).. I thought it was easier (and even required) to seperate the patches this way, but I seem to have been wrong ;p. Anyway, next time, this patch will be incorporated with the first patch. I'll leave the third patch in place, since it's completely unrelated. Thanks, Ivo _______________________________________________ i2c mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/i2c
