Hi Marco, On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 08:37:25AM -0300, Marco Aurelio da Costa wrote:
> I will have to understand the buffered mode first, but at worse I will > have to check which mode is being used and add another logic path. Yes, let's hope it can be worked into the current logic then... > My ideas was to share the platform and the isa code. This is easy > enough. For the PCA9665, the platform will not define the reset > function, and the algorithm will not even try use it. Okay, got it. I agree. > I can do that then. We should then pass the frequency. For the 9564, I > will just accept the chip defined frequencies. Sounds like the right way to do it. I just wonder if we simply can enforce this change of platform_data or if we should provide some transition feature. Jean, Ben, others, what are your experiences? > That is also my view. I will start coding, and will send you the patch > for review later. Happy hacking! :D Bye, Wolfram -- Dipl.-Ing. Wolfram Sang | http://www.pengutronix.de Pengutronix - Linux Solutions for Science and Industry
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ i2c mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/i2c
