On Tue, 21 Oct 2008 19:57:09 -0400, Jon Smirl wrote: > On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 4:36 AM, Jean Delvare <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Honestly I don't see any value in this driver. There's nothing you can > > do with it that you couldn't already do without it. > > I need a driver so that my device tree will bind and tell me the i2c > address of the device.
This is rubbish. It's perfectly fine to let the I2C device be instantiated from the device tree without having a driver that binds to it. The device tree and the instantiated device, not the driver, tell you the I2C address of the device. > We may also build a device in the future with two of these chips. I fail to see how it matters. -- Jean Delvare _______________________________________________ i2c mailing list i2c@lm-sensors.org http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/i2c
