Hyoungshick, et al, How would you position your draft-kim-i2nsf-security-management-architecture-01 with regard to the I2NSF framework draft? I find there are a lot of duplicated content to the I2nsf framework draft.
There are some differences, such as the following: Are you trying to define how "security policy" is structured? [cid:[email protected]] Will the "High Level security management" eventually lead to Client Facing Policy data models? Do you plan to define interfaces between all those components depicted in Figure 1? The interfaces between some of those components are not really in the I2NSF WG current charter, such as "Security Policy Manager" <-> "NSF Capability Manager", or the interface between "Application Logic" <-> "Policy Updater". Are those components in your current implementation? Is it like an "example of one implementation"? Thanks, Linda
_______________________________________________ I2nsf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2nsf
