Linda, Adrian and I2NSF people:
It appears I missed Paul’s and Daniels comments for the problem statement/use case. I’ll send my comment resolution to the list today. Sue From: I2nsf [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Susan Hares Sent: Wednesday, November 9, 2016 9:40 PM To: 'Linda Dunbar'; [email protected] Subject: Re: [I2nsf] IETF-97 I2NSF agenda revised Linda: I’m going to submit a -version 3 as soon as the IETF draft open again. I will send a version 3 out to the list (in text form) so that people can provide me additional comments. I will ask for any other comments on the list on Monday am? At the meeting, It would be good to go to WG Last call. Sue From: Linda Dunbar [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, November 3, 2016 11:52 AM To: Susan Hares; [email protected] Subject: RE: [I2nsf] IETF-97 I2NSF agenda revised Sue, Sure. Are there any gating issues for moving it to WGLC? Linda From: Susan Hares [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: 2016年11月3日 10:47 To: Linda Dunbar <[email protected]>; [email protected] Subject: RE: [I2nsf] IETF-97 I2NSF agenda revised Linda: May I tentatively get a time slot for the Problem statement and use case? 5 minutes or less would be fine. Sue Hares From: I2nsf [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Linda Dunbar Sent: Thursday, November 3, 2016 11:33 AM To: '[email protected]' Subject: Re: [I2nsf] IETF-97 I2NSF agenda revised Thanks to people pointing out some missing items. The I2NSF agenda has been revised. https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/97/agenda/i2nsf/ If you requested agenda time and don't see yourself there, or if you need to make a correction, please let the chairs know. Thanks, Linda & Adrian
_______________________________________________ I2nsf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2nsf
