Here are the conflicts I have requested to avoid for the IETF98. If you plan to make presentation, but have specific session conflict, please let us know.
Linda & Adrian. -----Original Message----- From: "IETF Meeting Session Request Tool" [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: 2017年1月5日 1:44 To: [email protected] Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; Linda Dunbar <[email protected]> Subject: i2nsf - New Meeting Session Request for IETF 98 A new meeting session request has just been submitted by Linda Dunbar, a Chair of the i2nsf working group. --------------------------------------------------------- Working Group Name: Interface to Network Security Functions Area Name: Security Area Session Requester: Linda Dunbar Number of Sessions: 1 Length of Session(s): 2 Hours Number of Attendees: 60 Conflicts to Avoid: First Priority: I2RS, IDR, TRILL, TEAS, RTGarea, LIME, SUPA, L2SM, NETconf, DOTS, SACM, SAAG,NFVrg, Second Priority: SFC, RTGWG, MILE, NETMOD, SDNrg, Third Priority: NVO3 Special Requests: --------------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ I2nsf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2nsf
