Ed:
Thank you for this comment. I will make this change in version-12. I’ll wait a few days to see if additional comments are provided during IETF LC. Sue From: NetNull [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, March 8, 2017 2:23 PM To: [email protected] Cc: IETF-Announce; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: Re: [I2nsf] Last Call: <draft-ietf-i2nsf-problem-and-use-cases-11.txt> (I2NSF Problem Statement and Use cases) to Proposed Standard I endorse this draft, and appreciate citation from the original use-case draft. However, note that my organization has changed from Fortinet to Curveball Networks Ed Lopez - Curveball Networks On March 8, 2017 at 1:40 PM, The IESG <[email protected]> wrote: The IESG has received a request from the Interface to Network Security Functions WG (i2nsf) to consider the following document: - 'I2NSF Problem Statement and Use cases' <draft-ietf-i2nsf-problem-and-use-cases-11.txt> as Proposed Standard The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the [email protected] mailing lists by 2017-03-22. Exceptionally, comments may be sent to [email protected] instead. In either case, please retain the beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting. Abstract This document describes the problem statement for Interface to Network Security Functions (I2NSF) as well as some companion use cases. The file can be obtained via https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-i2nsf-problem-and-use-cases/ IESG discussion can be tracked via https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-i2nsf-problem-and-use-cases/ballot/ No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D. _______________________________________________ I2nsf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2nsf
_______________________________________________ I2nsf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2nsf
