Alia Atlas has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-i2nsf-problem-and-use-cases-12: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-i2nsf-problem-and-use-cases/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Given that the WG charter gave i2nsf the decision about whether to publish as an RFC and that this is Informational, I am fine with this document being published as an RFC. I think that it will serve as useful background to folks considering the i2nsf work and understanding the motivations for standardizing interfaces that have previously been vendor-specific. _______________________________________________ I2nsf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2nsf
