On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 6:01 PM, Adam Roach <[email protected]> wrote: > Adam Roach has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-i2nsf-problem-and-use-cases-12: No Objection > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all > email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this > introductory paragraph, however.) > > > Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html > for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. > > > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-i2nsf-problem-and-use-cases/ > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > COMMENT: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > I agree with Mirja's DISCUSS, which appears to have been mostly > addressed. The IESG writeup appears to need updating to match the new > document's intended status.
As an FYI , if the ballot is updated, then everyone needs to recast their ballots, so I updated the datatracker status for the document and the shepherd can update their report. I can add some text to my YES ballot to explain the change. > > I am voting No Objection rather than Abstaining for the reasons Ben > outlines in his No Objection. > Thanks. > -- Best regards, Kathleen _______________________________________________ I2nsf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2nsf
