Hi all,

I am in layovers. Please wait for a more detailed reply. We will pull scattered 
around terminology definitions about attestation from various drafts, include 
Monty Wiseman from GE Global Research and Hannes Tschofenig from ARM as 
authors, and start a dedicated document on attestation terminology. 
Contributions are welcome, more detail soon. There will be a skeleton document 
in a github repo soon, correspondingly.

Sincerely yours,

Henk

On May 18, 2017 6:10:01 PM GMT+02:00, John Strassner <straz...@gmail.com> wrote:
>Hi Linda,
>
>I will start on these in the middle of next week. I am happy to
>coordinate
>the editing as usual; however, attestation will need input from Henk
>and
>Diego.
>
>regards,
>John
>
>On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 8:25 AM, Linda Dunbar <linda.dun...@huawei.com>
>wrote:
>
>> John, Sue, Diego, Frank, and Henk,
>>
>>
>>
>> During the I2NSF terminology discussion at I2NSF WG session in
>IETF98,
>> there were some discussions on if terminologies related to
>Attestation need
>> to be added to the terminology draft. Want to ask if there is any
>plan to
>> add them.
>>
>> The IETF 98 meeting notes also have the following:
>>
>>
>>
>> - Need to explore metadata more (its use in netmod is not aligned
>with
>> that of other SDOs)
>>
>> - Need to explore Events
>>
>>   - should we differentiate between event types (e.g., alarms vs.
>> threshold crossings) or assume that all are equal?
>>
>>   - how robust a definition is needed?
>>
>> - Would like to see if terminology can help mismatch between info and
>data
>> models
>>
>>
>>
>> AI: start list email threads on the list of issues presented
>>
>>
>>
>> Just checking if those issues will be addressed.
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks, Linda
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>-- 
>regards,
>John

-- 
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
_______________________________________________
I2nsf mailing list
I2nsf@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2nsf

Reply via email to