Reviewer: Stewart Bryant Review result: Ready with Nits I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft.
For more information, please see the FAQ at <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Document: draft-ietf-i2nsf-framework-08 Reviewer: Stewart Bryant Review Date: 2017-10-15 IETF LC End Date: 2017-10-25 IESG Telechat date: 2017-10-26 Summary: This is a well written document. There are a couple of things the authors need to look at, but it is ready to be published Major issues: None Minor issues: None Nits/editorial comments: The authors should consider whether the 2119 boilerplate is really needed as no RFC2119 keywords are used (something they point out to the reader) ====== a query-based interface is used by the the I2NSF Management System to obatin information, whereas a report-based interface SB Typo - obtain ===== 9.2. Registration Categories SB> I would think that anything in the IPFIX registry was a candidate for such categories, after all IPFIX is designed and used to monitor flows, often for security reasons. _______________________________________________ I2nsf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2nsf
