Sent from my iPhone
> On Oct 24, 2017, at 11:08 PM, Ben Campbell <[email protected]> wrote: > > Ben Campbell has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-i2nsf-framework-08: No Objection > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all > email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this > introductory paragraph, however.) > > > Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html > for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. > > > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-i2nsf-framework/ > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > COMMENT: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > -2: If no 2119 keywords are used, please remove the boilerplate. But if you do > need to keep it, please use the updated boilerplate from 8174, since there are > a number of lower case versions of 2119 keywords. > Thanks, I have been catching this, but must have missed it in this draft. > -6.2: first bullet: I am always worried about text advising that "closed > environments" have lower security requirements. That has proven false so many > times we really shouldn't be encouraging it. This is especially worrisome > since > the first paragraph of section 11 talks about the importance of "trustworthy, > robust, and fully secured access". Yes, good catch. Was 'isolated' the intent here? If so, that's fine to assume a higher level of trust, but unlikely to be using I2NSF. Thanks, Kathleen > > > _______________________________________________ > I2nsf mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2nsf _______________________________________________ I2nsf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2nsf
