Suresh, Thank you very much for reviewing the draft. Answer to your questions are inserted below:
-----Original Message----- From: Suresh Krishnan [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2017 9:05 AM To: The IESG <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected]; Adrian Farrel <[email protected]>; Yoav Nir <[email protected]>; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: Suresh Krishnan's No Objection on draft-ietf-i2nsf-framework-08: (with COMMENT) Suresh Krishnan has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-i2nsf-framework-08: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-i2nsf-framework/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- I am not sure what the "addr" field in the Packet Content Matching Capability Index for IPv6 means (i.e. what protocol field it corresponds to) and I think it should be clarified. [Linda] The "addr" field in the packet content (to be further specified in the I2NSF data model) will reference the “address types” already defined by https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-netmod-acl-model/ such as: yang:mac-address inet: ipv6-prefix inet: ipv4-prefix, inet: dicp etc. _______________________________________________ I2nsf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2nsf
