I completely agree with Diego.

The purpose of a capability model is to 'understand each other' with precise, thus more granular, information that allows avoiding any ambiguity. Hence, a controller could automatically decide how to use NSFs.

It is pretty known that marketing units repackage NSFs with brand new names that are good for selling software and equipment, but increase confusion for technical people (and for automatic systems as well).

Imagine a scenario where a company make an epsilon modification to an IDS and sells it as a Smart IDS (SIDS). An automatic system must understand what 'Smart' means and what a SIDS can do that an IDS cannot actually do already. And now think about a concrete case, the IPS...

So, in my opinion, flat enumeration of capabilities is the only way to deal with issue (different fields, like the actions that enforce, the flows/traffic they can identify, the events they react to, etc., i.e., the capability model we are authoring).

Regards,
Aldo


On 16/07/2018 15:53, Diego R. Lopez wrote:
If you associate a capability action (let's say collect-attack-evidence-enable) 
with a particular kind of device (as part of the antivirus branch) I would not 
be able to declare or use that particular capability unless the provider has 
stated the function is an antivirus, and therefore consider all the other 
capabilities for the antivirus. What is more, this prevents to have a common 
semantics for something like collect-attack-evidence-enable if you have to 
declare it under other branches. My understanding is that we have to deal with 
flat enumeration of capabilities, but I might be completely mistaken from the 
beginning...

Be goode,

--
"Esta vez no fallaremos, Doctor Infierno"

Dr Diego R. Lopez
Telefonica I+D
https://www.linkedin.com/in/dr2lopez/

e-mail: [email protected]
Tel:         +34 913 129 041
Mobile:  +34 682 051 091
----------------------------------

On 16/07/2018, 08:55, "Xialiang (Frank, Network Integration Technology Research 
Dept)" <[email protected]> wrote:

     Hi Diego,
     Thanks for your quick comments. In general, we agree with you that they 
should be as the various capabilities to be applied.
     But could you please clarify more about what is the difference to be as 
capability model vs yang grouping model definition?

     Thanks!

     B.R.
     Frank

     -----邮件原件-----
     发件人: Diego R. Lopez [mailto:[email protected]]
     发送时间: 2018年7月16日 20:00
     收件人: Dongyue (Yue, Network Integration Technology Research Dept) 
<[email protected]>; [email protected]
     抄送: Xialiang (Frank, Network Integration Technology Research Dept) 
<[email protected]>
     主题: Re: [I2nsf] 转发: New Version Notification for 
draft-dong-i2nsf-asf-config-00.txt

     Hi,

     My general comment to these definitions (and others that may come) is that we should try to deal with 
them in terms of capabilities, and not in terms of groupings associated to current (virtual or physical) 
devices. As an example, rather than thinking of "antivirus", I'd propose to think about 
"content analysis" or "content scanning" capabilities.

     Be goode,

     --
     "Esta vez no fallaremos, Doctor Infierno"

     Dr Diego R. Lopez
     Telefonica I+D
     https://www.linkedin.com/in/dr2lopez/

     e-mail: [email protected]
     Tel:         +34 913 129 041
     Mobile:  +34 682 051 091
     ----------------------------------

     On 16/07/2018, 07:02, "I2nsf on behalf of Dongyue (Yue, Network Integration 
Technology Research Dept)" <[email protected] on behalf of [email protected]> 
wrote:

         Dear all,

         The action part of the NSF-facing data model listed many security 
function actions, such as antivirus, ips, ids, and etc, that will be applid on 
traffic flow when the event and condition clauses are satisfied. However, I 
think it only list the corresponding names. And each type of the secuity 
function action (i.e. ips, antivirus, etc.) should have many selective profiles 
that could be executed. Therefore, we proposed a draft, 
draf-dong-i2nsf-asf-config-00, that specifies the configuration detail for each 
of the security function profile settings. And the NSF-facing data model is 
able to reference these profiles.

         This -00 version of draft only contains the antivirus, ips, and 
anti-ddos profiles.

         * Antivirus: The following figure shows the top-level tree diagram for 
antivirus profile settings. Each profile contains the configuration data for 
detection methods, detection configurations, signature exceptions, application 
exceptions, and the white lists configruations.

             +--rw antivirus
                +--rw antivirus-enable
                +--rw profiles
                   +--rw profile *  [name]
                   +--rw name
                   +--rw description
                   +--rw collect-attack-evidence-enable
                   +--rw sandbox-detection-enable
                   +--rw heuristic-detection-enable
                   +--rw detect*  [protocol]
                   |  . . .
                   +--rw exception-application* [application-name]
                   |  . . .
                   +--rw exception-signature*  [signature-id]
                   |  . . .
                   +--rw white-list
                      . . .

         * IPS: The following figure shows the top-level tree diagram for IPS 
profile settings. Each profile contains the configuration data for signature 
sets, signature exceptions, and protocol control.

             +--rw ips-config
                +--rw ips-enable
                +--rw profiles
                   +--rw profile*  [name]
                   +  . . .
                   +--rw domain-filter
                   |  . . .
                   +--rw signature-sets
                   |  . . .
                   +--rw exception-signatures
                   |  . . .
                   +--rw protocol-control
                      +--rw dns-check
                      | . . .
                      +--rw http-check
                        . . .

         * Anti-ddos: The anti-ddos part contains the configruation of the 
alter rate and/or maximum speed/bandwidth to trigger the prevention functions 
for each type of DDoS attacks.

         For more details, please review the draft: 
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-dong-i2nsf-asf-config-00

         We would like to obatain comments from i2nsf WG. Is this draft 
valuable as an individual draft and will the NSF-facing data model reference 
these profiles?
         We will appreciate all the comments from I2NSF WG.

         Best Regards,
         Yue

         -----邮件原件-----
         发件人: I2nsf [mailto:[email protected]] 代表 Dongyue (Yue, Network 
Integration Technology Research Dept)
         发送时间: 2018年6月30日 15:11
         收件人: [email protected]
         抄送: Xialiang (Frank, Network Integration Technology Research Dept) 
<[email protected]>
         主题: [I2nsf] 转发: New Version Notification for 
draft-dong-i2nsf-asf-config-00.txt

         Dear All,

         We have submitted a new draft about the nsf-facing interface data 
model for configuration of some advanced security functions including 
antivirus, antiddos, and ips. We will appreciate all comments.

         Best Regards,
         Yue

         -----邮件原件-----
         发件人: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
         发送时间: 2018年6月30日 15:06
         收件人: Dongyue (Yue, Network Integration Technology Research Dept) 
<[email protected]>; Xialiang (Frank, Network Integration Technology Research Dept) 
<[email protected]>
         主题: New Version Notification for draft-dong-i2nsf-asf-config-00.txt


         A new version of I-D, draft-dong-i2nsf-asf-config-00.txt
         has been successfully submitted by Yue Dong and posted to the IETF 
repository.

         Name:draft-dong-i2nsf-asf-config
         Revision:00
         Title:Configuration of Advanced Security Functions with I2NSF Security 
Controller
         Document date:2018-06-30
         Group:Individual Submission
         Pages:29
         URL:            
https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-dong-i2nsf-asf-config-00.txt
         Status:         
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dong-i2nsf-asf-config/
         Htmlized:       
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-dong-i2nsf-asf-config-00
         Htmlized:       
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-dong-i2nsf-asf-config


         Abstract:
            This draft defines a network security function (NSF-) facing
            interface of the security controller for the purpose of configuring
            some advanced security functions.  These advanced security functions
            include antivirus, anti-ddos, and intrusion prevention system (IPS).
            The interface is presented in a YANG data model fashion and can be
            used to deploy a large amount of NSF blocks that all support above
            mentioned functions in the software defined network (SDN) based
            paradigm.




         Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of 
submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.

         The IETF Secretariat

         _______________________________________________
         I2nsf mailing list
         [email protected]
         https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2nsf
         _______________________________________________
         I2nsf mailing list
         [email protected]
         https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2nsf



     ________________________________

     Este mensaje y sus adjuntos se dirigen exclusivamente a su destinatario, 
puede contener información privilegiada o confidencial y es para uso exclusivo 
de la persona o entidad de destino. Si no es usted. el destinatario indicado, 
queda notificado de que la lectura, utilización, divulgación y/o copia sin 
autorización puede estar prohibida en virtud de la legislación vigente. Si ha 
recibido este mensaje por error, le rogamos que nos lo comunique inmediatamente 
por esta misma vía y proceda a su destrucción.

     The information contained in this transmission is privileged and 
confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity 
named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you 
are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this 
communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmission in 
error, do not read it. Please immediately reply to the sender that you have 
received this communication in error and then delete it.

     Esta mensagem e seus anexos se dirigem exclusivamente ao seu destinatário, 
pode conter informação privilegiada ou confidencial e é para uso exclusivo da 
pessoa ou entidade de destino. Se não é vossa senhoria o destinatário indicado, 
fica notificado de que a leitura, utilização, divulgação e/ou cópia sem 
autorização pode estar proibida em virtude da legislação vigente. Se recebeu 
esta mensagem por erro, rogamos-lhe que nos o comunique imediatamente por esta 
mesma via e proceda a sua destruição



________________________________

Este mensaje y sus adjuntos se dirigen exclusivamente a su destinatario, puede 
contener información privilegiada o confidencial y es para uso exclusivo de la 
persona o entidad de destino. Si no es usted. el destinatario indicado, queda 
notificado de que la lectura, utilización, divulgación y/o copia sin 
autorización puede estar prohibida en virtud de la legislación vigente. Si ha 
recibido este mensaje por error, le rogamos que nos lo comunique inmediatamente 
por esta misma vía y proceda a su destrucción.

The information contained in this transmission is privileged and confidential 
information intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. 
If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby 
notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication 
is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, do not 
read it. Please immediately reply to the sender that you have received this 
communication in error and then delete it.

Esta mensagem e seus anexos se dirigem exclusivamente ao seu destinatário, pode 
conter informação privilegiada ou confidencial e é para uso exclusivo da pessoa 
ou entidade de destino. Se não é vossa senhoria o destinatário indicado, fica 
notificado de que a leitura, utilização, divulgação e/ou cópia sem autorização 
pode estar proibida em virtude da legislação vigente. Se recebeu esta mensagem 
por erro, rogamos-lhe que nos o comunique imediatamente por esta mesma via e 
proceda a sua destruição
_______________________________________________
I2nsf mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2nsf



Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

_______________________________________________
I2nsf mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2nsf
  • Re: [I2nsf]... Diego R. Lopez
    • Re: [I... Cataldo Basile
      • [I... Dongyue (Yue, Network Integration Technology Research Dept)
        • ... Cataldo Basile
    • [I2nsf... Xialiang (Frank, Network Integration Technology Research Dept)

Reply via email to