Hi Linda:

No, it does not. In fact, we should fix the description associated to each 
value.

Thank you.

Best Regards.

> El 5 dic 2018, a las 18:46, Linda Dunbar <[email protected]> escribió:
> 
>  
> Gabriel and Rafa,
>  
> On Page 34 (Appendix A), you have the following typedef
>  
> typedef ipsec-next-layer-proto {
> type enumeration {
> enum TCP { description "PROTECT the traffic with IPsec"; }
> enum UDP { description "BYPASS the traffic"; }
> enum SCTP { description "PROTECT the traffic with IPsec";}
> enum DCCP { description "PROTECT the traffic with IPsec";}
> enum ICMP { description "PROTECT the traffic with IPsec";}
> enum IPv6-ICMP { description "PROTECT the traffic with IPsec";}
> enum MH {description "PROTECT the traffic with IPsec";}
> enum GRE {description "PROTECT the traffic with IPsec";}
> }
> description "Next layer proto on top of IP";
> }
>  
> With the following definition, does it mean all UDP traffic are “BYPASS”?
> enum UDP { description "BYPASS the traffic"; }
>  
> Thanks, Linda 

-------------------------------------------------------
Rafa Marin-Lopez, PhD
Dept. Information and Communications Engineering (DIIC)
Faculty of Computer Science-University of Murcia
30100 Murcia - Spain
Telf: +34868888501 Fax: +34868884151 e-mail: [email protected]
-------------------------------------------------------




_______________________________________________
I2nsf mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2nsf

Reply via email to