Hi Paul, I think replacing the word “Applicability” by “Use” would do it, however, my point was rather that a real applicability statement would have been more useful.
Mirja > On 9. Aug 2019, at 08:10, Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Hi Mirja, > This applicability draft enhances the use cases in RFC 8192 (I2NSF Problem > Statement and Use Cases) > along with the I2NSF data models, considering the technologies for > cloud-based security services > such as SFC, SDN, and NFV. > If you suggest a better title for this draft, it will be great. > > Also, I submitted a new version of this draft having an RFC and a draft of > DOTS WG work as Normative references: > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-i2nsf-applicability-17 > > Thanks. > > Best Regards, > Paul > > On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 2:12 AM Mirja Kühlewind via Datatracker > <[email protected]> wrote: > Mirja Kühlewind has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-i2nsf-applicability-16: Abstain > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all > email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this > introductory paragraph, however.) > > > Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html > for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. > > > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-i2nsf-applicability/ > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > COMMENT: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > I find the title of this document rather misleading as the doc mainly outlines > use cases. I would have expected that the boundaries of the applicability of > i2nsf to certain scenarios are discussed which is not the case. My > understanding from the charter would further be that an applicability > statement > is connected to a specific data model (and I would also have expected that > statement to be published in the same document). > > One minor additional comment: I'm surprised to only see a reference to > AVANT-GUARD but no mentioning of the IETF DOTS effort.... > > > _______________________________________________ > I2nsf mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2nsf > > > -- > =========================== > Mr.. Jaehoon (Paul) Jeong, Ph.D. > Associate Professor > Department of Software > Sungkyunkwan University > Office: +82-31-299-4957 > Email: [email protected], [email protected] > Personal Homepage: http://iotlab.skku.edu/people-jaehoon-jeong.php _______________________________________________ I2nsf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2nsf
