Paul, We think that the existing WG drafts are mature, doesn’t need to occupy the precious meeting slots in IETF106. We can have side discussion during IETF106 if there are controversial issues that need people to discuss. Mailing list is another venue to discuss. We need to complete all the remaining WG drafts and move to IESG.
Thank you for all the contributions to I2NSF WG. Linda From: Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong <[email protected]> Sent: Saturday, October 05, 2019 12:22 AM To: Linda Dunbar <[email protected]>; Yoav Nir <[email protected]> Cc: Roman Danyliw <[email protected]>; [email protected]; [email protected]; Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [I2nsf] i2nsf - Not having a session at IETF 106 Hi Linda and Yoav, Is this a temporary WG meeting skip? Or are you closing the I2NSF WG soon? I believe that the I2NSF WG can recharter our missions for the deployment of the I2NSF work into the industry such as (i) Data Model for NSF Database Configuration at Security Control for Security Policy Translation, (ii) Data Model for the Interaction between I2NSF Security Controller and SFC Classifier for Security Traffic Steering, (iii) Data Model for the Interaction between I2NSF Security Controller and SDN Controller (i.e., Switch Controller) for Efficient Security Services through the Cooperation between SDN Switches and NSFs, (iv) Data Model for the Interaction between I2NSF Developer's Management System and NSF MANO for Efficient NSF Lifecycle and Load-balancing Management, and (v) Intent-Based Security Services using I2NSF Framework and Security Policy Translator. Those will be the next steps as the 2nd phase of the I2NSF WG for the realization of our work. I hope we can discuss them at IETF-107 I2NSF WG session. Thanks. Best Regards, Paul On Sat, Oct 5, 2019 at 1:08 PM Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Hi Linda and Yoav, my SKKU team are still working on the data model drafts of Consumer-Facing Interface and NSF-Facing Interface because the comments from YANG doctors require many changes. I will be able to submit these two drafts by the end of this October. I will submit other WG and individual drafts by the IETF-106 I-D submission due. My team are working on the IETF-106 I2NSF Hackathon for the NSF Monitoring Data Model. I will share the progress of those things with the slides by the I2NSF mailing list. Thanks. Best Regards, Paul 2019년 10월 5일 (토) 오전 7:20, IETF Meeting Session Request Tool <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>님이 작성: Linda Dunbar, a chair of the i2nsf working group, indicated that the i2nsf working group does not plan to hold a session at IETF 106. This message was generated and sent by the IETF Meeting Session Request Tool. _______________________________________________ I2nsf mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2nsf<https://nam03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ietf.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fi2nsf&data=02%7C01%7Clinda.dunbar%40futurewei.com%7C24e08864f8f746ab401808d749540a5e%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C0%7C637058497623637035&sdata=%2FPu1vSbeXPJuNHJ1%2FO%2BZMDsiqrd4dmoZr5vbpclGay0%3D&reserved=0> -- =========================== Mr. Jaehoon (Paul) Jeong, Ph.D. Associate Professor Department of Software Sungkyunkwan University Office: +82-31-299-4957 Email: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>, [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Personal Homepage: http://iotlab.skku.edu/people-jaehoon-jeong.php<https://nam03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fcpslab.skku.edu%2Fpeople-jaehoon-jeong.php&data=02%7C01%7Clinda.dunbar%40futurewei.com%7C24e08864f8f746ab401808d749540a5e%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C0%7C637058497623637035&sdata=hbN8bfuWBI9jpkmEAB9AKrq6QVlRj9k%2F2Q6vnx4f1pY%3D&reserved=0>
_______________________________________________ I2nsf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2nsf
