Hi Francesca, I have addressed your comments in the following revision: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-i2nsf-capability-data-model-25
Thanks. Best Regards, Paul On Wed, Feb 2, 2022 at 3:33 AM Francesca Palombini via Datatracker < [email protected]> wrote: > Francesca Palombini has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-i2nsf-capability-data-model-24: No Objection > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all > email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this > introductory paragraph, however.) > > > Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/blog/handling-iesg-ballot-positions/ > for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. > > > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-i2nsf-capability-data-model/ > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > COMMENT: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Thank you for the work on this document. > > I only have one minor comment: > > Please update the references to RFC 7230, RFC 7231 and RFC 2818 with > draft-ietf-httpbis-semantics-19 and draft-ietf-httpbis-messaging-19, which > will > obsolete them. Note that the HTTP drafts are with the RFC Editor in > AUTH48, so > will not delay publication of your document. > > Francesca > > > > _______________________________________________ > I2nsf mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2nsf >
_______________________________________________ I2nsf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2nsf
