Still looks fine. On Thu, Feb 10, 2022 at 5:21 PM Amanda Baber via RT < [email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Tim (CC to the i2nsf WG), > > Version -20 of this document is on next Thursday's IESG telechat agenda. > It looks like you would've reviewed version -16. Is this still OK? > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-i2nsf-nsf-facing-interface-dm/ > > thanks, > Amanda > > On Fri Dec 17 15:51:48 2021, [email protected] wrote: > > Pardon the delay. That one looks OK to me. > > > > On Thu, Dec 16, 2021 at 11:28 AM Sabrina Tanamal via RT < > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Hi Martin and Tim, > > > > > > Have you had a chance to review this request? > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > Sabrina Tanamal > > > Lead IANA Services Specialist > > > > > > On Thu Nov 18 15:50:36 2021, michelle.cotton wrote: > > > > Hi Martin and Tim, > > > > (CC to the i2nsf WG) > > > > > > > > As designated experts for the IETF XML Registry, > > > > can you please review the XML ns registration in this document? > > > > > > > > > > > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-i2nsf-nsf-facing-interface-dm/ > > > > > > > > The due date for this request is 02 December 2021. > > > > > > > > Thank you, > > > > > > > > Michelle Cotton > > > > IANA Services > > > > > > > >
_______________________________________________ I2nsf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2nsf
