Francesca Palombini has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-i2nsf-nsf-facing-interface-dm-21: Discuss
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/blog/handling-iesg-ballot-positions/ for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-i2nsf-nsf-facing-interface-dm/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- DISCUSS: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Thank you for the work on this document. I have one DISCUSS point and two editorial comments. As noted in https://www.ietf.org/blog/handling-iesg-ballot-positions/, a DISCUSS ballot is a request to have a discussion; I really think that the document would be improved with a change here, but can be convinced otherwise. Francesca 1. ----- leaf description FP: There is 22 occurrences of the leaf description in the model. If I understand correctly, all 22 of these are meant to contain human readable text. As a result you need to specify language tags for those fields, or justify why language tagging is not needed. For details, see RFC 2277 (BCP 18), Section 4.2. Also note that RFC 5646 becomes a Normative Reference when the ability to tag languages is added. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 2. ----- Figure 2 FP: Please fix the copy paste typo in figure 2. 3. ----- Hypertext Transfer Protocol version 1.X (HTTP/1.X) FP: please replace X with 1 (2 occurrences) _______________________________________________ I2nsf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2nsf
