Hi Paul! Thanks for this last update. I’ve advanced the document for publication.
Congratulations to you and the document team, and the WG for this work. Well done! Roman From: Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong <[email protected]> Sent: Saturday, May 14, 2022 5:38 AM To: Roman Danyliw <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected]; skku-iotlab-members <[email protected]>; Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [I2nsf] IESG feedback on draft-ietf-i2nsf-capability-data-model-30 Hi Roman, I have reflected your comments on the revision of the I2NSF Capability YANG Data Model draft: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-i2nsf-capability-data-model-31#page-72 Thanks. Best Regards, Paul On Sat, May 14, 2022 at 3:24 AM Roman Danyliw <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Hi! Thank you for all of the edits on draft-ietf-i2nsf-capability-data-model which resolved IESG feedback. I'm going to ask for one more edit which will reverting a change made based on IESG review. In the -24 /-25 which was reviewed by the IESG, RFC8805 was correctly listed as a normative reference. IESG feedback suggested that because this was an ISE document, referencing this document normatively was an problem. After further discussion, in fact, RFC8805 was appropriately called out as a DOWNREF in the IETF LC with no objection from the community, and it is needed to fully explain the semantics of the YANG model. Please move RFC8805 back to being a normative reference. I've advanced the document to "Approved-announcement to be sent::Revised I-D Needed". Again, thanks for all of the work here. Roman _______________________________________________ I2nsf mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2nsf
_______________________________________________ I2nsf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2nsf
