Hi I2NSF WG! > -----Original Message----- > From: iesg <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Zaheduzzaman Sarker via > Datatracker > Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2022 11:06 AM > To: The IESG <[email protected]> > Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; > [email protected]; [email protected] > Subject: Zaheduzzaman Sarker's No Objection on draft-ietf-i2nsf-nsf- > monitoring-data-model-15: (with COMMENT) > > Zaheduzzaman Sarker has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-i2nsf-nsf-monitoring-data-model-15: No Objection > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email > addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory > paragraph, however.) > > > Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/blog/handling-iesg-ballot-positions/ > for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. > > > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-i2nsf-nsf-monitoring-data-model/ > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > COMMENT: > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
[snip] > I am curious to know why doesn't "i2nsf-nsf-event" sub leaf "i2nsf-nsf- > detection-voip-vocn" have a "action*" where rest of the events have actions? I wanted to follow-up on this comment. It seems that in -18, "action*" is now dropped from all "i2nsf-nsf-event" sub leafs but "i2nsf-nsf-log-dpi". We appear to be in a different inconsistent situation. Was this intention? Regards, Roman _______________________________________________ I2nsf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2nsf
