Hi Linda, Thanks for the announcement of the updates for I2NSF WG. draft-ietf-i2nsf-nsf-monitoring-data-model-18 is under "Approved-announcement to be sent::AD Followup". The approval announcement will be done today or tomorrow.
draft-ietf-i2nsf-registration-interface-dm-16 has the Document Shepherd Writeup be ready: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-i2nsf-registration-interface-dm/shepherdwriteup/ draft-ietf-i2nsf-consumer-facing-interface-dm-19 has been posted today and its Shepherd Writeup will be posted since Linda has the writeup to post. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-i2nsf-consumer-facing-interface-dm/ As you said, we need to continue the discussion on the mailing list to make the objectives align with the expertise of the contributors. I feel that we need a session at IETF 114 to finalize the proposal to have a handful of WG items for the next step in I2NSF. Thanks for your leadership and support for our WG work. Best Regards, Paul On Wed, May 18, 2022 at 5:49 AM Linda Dunbar <[email protected]> wrote: > I2NSF WG participants: > > > > Yesterday I2NSF WG reached a big milestone with 2 RFCs being approved by > IESG for publication. Many thanks to the WG and authors for the tireless > work in addressing all the comments along the way. It has been a long > process. > > > > The IESG has approved the following document: > > - 'I2NSF Capability YANG Data Model' > > (draft-ietf-i2nsf-capability-data-model-31.txt) as Proposed Standard > > > > The IESG has approved the following document: > > - 'I2NSF Network Security Function-Facing Interface YANG Data Model' > > (draft-ietf-i2nsf-nsf-facing-interface-dm-27.txt) as Proposed Standard > > > > In addition, the draft-ietf-i2nsf-nsf-monitoring-data-model-18 has got > enough support from IESG review to move forward, now waiting for our AD > Roman’s final review. > > > > The authors have requested WG LC for the following two I2NSF WG drafts: > > draft-ietf-i2nsf-consumer-facing-interface-dm-18 > > draft-ietf-i2nsf-registration-interface-dm-16 > > > > I2NSF Chairs will complete the Shepherd review this week, request early > review from Ops/Sec Directorates, and issue the WGLC. > > > > At IETF 113, we discussed re-chartering proposal. Some people felt that > the scope of work proposed is exceeding the expertise of the participants. > We need to continue the discussion on the mailing list to make the > objectives align with the expertise of the contributors. > > > > Do people feel that we need a session at IETF114 to finalize the proposal? > > > > Thanks, Linda > _______________________________________________ > I2nsf mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2nsf >
_______________________________________________ I2nsf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2nsf
