Hi!

I wanted to follow-up on my summary of the WG next step from November [4].

I'm excited to see that we are closing in on publishing the final two WG 
deliverables [1] [2].  My hope is to have [1] and [2] in IETF Last Call before 
the Yokohama meeting.  Their publication will release an entire cluster of 
I2NSF documents per Cluster-405 [3].  After [1] [2] are passed to the RFC 
Editor (i.e., finished IETF Last Call and clear IESG review), all planned WG 
milestones will be concluded, and I will be closing the WG.  

I appreciate that re-chartering has been brought up a few times over the last 
few years, last at IEFT 115 and again proposed for IETF 116 [5].  However, I 
don't see that any of the circumstances outlined in [4] as having changed.  I 
applaud the WG on its success in submitting 9 documents for publication and 
with it the chartered scope of work.

Regards,
Roman

[1] 
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-i2nsf-consumer-facing-interface-dm/
[2] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-i2nsf-registration-interface-dm/
[3] https://www.rfc-editor.org/cluster_info.php?cid=C405
[4] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/i2nsf/24bXfVCZ7TRMpVi1-lbzWMLvMSQ/
[5] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/i2nsf/ZBJpynlZe8Z9Bcalk0hwZxUyX-k/

_______________________________________________
I2nsf mailing list
I2nsf@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2nsf

Reply via email to