Or May be some thing like Control Plane interface (CPi) and Data Forwarding/Forwarder interface (DFi)?.
-Nagendra -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Noel Chiappa Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2012 8:11 AM To: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: [i2rs] Progressing the chartering effort > From: "Zach Seils (seils)" <[email protected]> > What about simple "control interface" and "data interface" designations? "Control interface" I like. I'm a lot less sold on "data interface" - it sonuds like some sort of programmatic thing, rather that (usually) a piece of hardware over which user data packets are sent. 'Physical interface' for the latter is probably not optimal, now that I think about it; we probably want to support virtual interfaces as well. How about 'network interface', though? Noel _______________________________________________ i2rs mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs _______________________________________________ i2rs mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs
