Agree with David, at least we are not reinventing the wheel and using well defined data model.
Regards, Jeff On Jan 24, 2013, at 17:20, "David Meyer" <[email protected]> wrote: > Agreed that YANG seems a reasonable place to start. --dmm > > Sent from my iPhone > > On Jan 24, 2013, at 8:26, Juergen Schoenwaelder > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 11:13:44AM -0500, Alia Atlas wrote: >>> Juergen, >>> >>> What would you recommend for an information model for i2rs? >> >> Frankly, I do not know. I am still unsure what the scope/complexity of >> i2rs really is. To find out, I guess people just have to pick >> something and get started. YANG tree diagrams are fine to get a quick >> overview of YANG data models, they likely won't be the right tool if >> many of data model items with more complex interrelationships are >> involved - then you need additional diagrams. >> >> /js >> >> -- >> Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH >> Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1, 28759 Bremen, Germany >> Fax: +49 421 200 3103 <http://www.jacobs-university.de/> >> _______________________________________________ >> i2rs mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs > _______________________________________________ > i2rs mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs _______________________________________________ i2rs mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs
