Ok then I think we all agree on this. Thread closed. (That was incredibly quick :).
Cheers, R. On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 3:47 PM, Russ White <[email protected]> wrote: > > IMHO, the answer should be "we're not defining a model that works only > centralized or distributed, but a just a model --use it any way you like." > > :-) > > Russ > > <>< > [email protected] > [email protected] > > On Mar 14, 2013, at 10:13 AM, Robert Raszuk <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I think I am hearing quite clearly from most of the presentations that >> there is sort of opinion that I2RS talks to RIBs from some form of >> centralized controllers/route servers/topology collectors etc ... >> >> Does this mean that I can't use I2RS in completely distributed manner >> without any central controller ? >> >> Note that more and more modern routers and switches gives customers >> x86 local compute facilities on the box. So I can easily imagine that >> I write a distributed application which communicates box to box at the >> application level and installs locally via I2RS interface it's >> "routes" to RIB. >> >> Is this model of operation out of scope of this WG ? >> >> Best regards, >> R. >> _______________________________________________ >> i2rs mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs _______________________________________________ i2rs mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs
