Wes,

I'll be happy to add the suggested words.  Personally,  I hope we can
modify an existing protocol...

Alia
On Jul 25, 2013 4:40 PM, "George, Wes" <[email protected]> wrote:

>  I have some concerns about 6.1 in terms of whether it could be
> interpreted as a definite statement of direction that we’ll be building a
> new protocol rather than identifying one to modify for use here, which I
> think is in conflict with section 5 of the problem statement. ****
>
> I agree that cobbling together several protocols that weren’t meant to be 
> integrated isn’t necessarily a good solution when compared with a single 
> protocol, so I think this may be a wording problem in the current text, 
> rather than a philosophical disagreement, but it’s worth confirming that 
> before we adopt this draft. If I’m right that it’s just a wording issue, it 
> may be as simple as adding the same words from the problem statement: ****
>
>          “Whether such a protocol is built upon extending****
>
>    existing mechanisms or requires a new mechanism requires further****
>
>    investigation.“****
>
> ** **
>
> Otherwise I think it’s in good shape.****
>
> ** **
>
> Thanks,****
>
> ** **
>
> Wes George****
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf
> Of *Alia Atlas
> *Sent:* Wednesday, July 24, 2013 5:52 PM
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* [i2rs] Call for Adoption by WG:
> draft-atlas-i2rs-architecture-01 (ends Aug 12)****
>
> ** **
>
> Please review draft-atlas-i2rs-architecture-01 and comment on whether it
> should be adopted by I2RS.  Detailed technical conversation is also most
> welcome.
>
> Authors: Are you aware of any IPR that applies to
> draft-atlas-i2rs-architecture-01? Is so, has this IPR been disclosed in
> compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more
> details).
>
> This WG call for adoption will complete on August 12.
>
> Thanks,
> Alia****
>
> ------------------------------
> This E-mail and any of its attachments may contain Time Warner Cable
> proprietary information, which is privileged, confidential, or subject to
> copyright belonging to Time Warner Cable. This E-mail is intended solely
> for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you
> are not the intended recipient of this E-mail, you are hereby notified that
> any dissemination, distribution, copying, or action taken in relation to
> the contents of and attachments to this E-mail is strictly prohibited and
> may be unlawful. If you have received this E-mail in error, please notify
> the sender immediately and permanently delete the original and any copy of
> this E-mail and any printout.
>
_______________________________________________
i2rs mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs

Reply via email to